Skip to Main Content
  • About Us
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • News & Insights
  • Events
  1. Industries
  2. Franchising and Distribution
  3. Petroleum Marketing

Petroleum Marketing

stock image oil derricks for petroleum marketing

For over 30 years Shipman lawyers have represented major oil companies and regional franchisors throughout the Eastern United States in all aspects of petroleum marketing counseling and litigation. We have extensive experience with both the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act ("PMPA") and state franchise statutes, as well as disputes involving antitrust, trademark, dealer termination, pricing, rent, breach of contract, unfair trade practices, terminalling and exchange agreements, transfers/assignments, comingling, and cross-hauling claims. We have also represented suppliers and franchisors in investigations by state attorneys general and state agencies.

We have litigated cases in state and federal trial courts in New England, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, and in the First and Second Circuit Courts of Appeal. We also represented Shell and Motiva in the only PMPA case to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In addition, we regularly advise clients regarding the laws and regulations that might apply to their operations in dozens of states, such as price gouging, licensing, promotions and giveaways, registration, signage, and security deposits.

The members of our Petroleum Marketing Practice Group are frequent speakers at Petroleum Marketing Attorneys meetings and regularly publish Petroleum Marketing Alerts that analyze recent cases and developments in the law.

Related Industries

  • Manufacturing

Experience

General

$5.5 Million Judgment for Client Following a Trial Involving Antitrust, Unfair Trade Practices and Breach of Contract Claims

In a case on the Connecticut state court complex litigation docket, the owner of a large gasoline terminal sued our clients claiming antitrust violations, breach of contract, unfair trade practices, misrepresentation, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. All of the plaintiff’s claims were disposed of before trial, and the case went forward solely on our clients' counterclaim for breach of contract. After two trials and two appeals, the court awarded our clients $5.5 million in damages and attorneys' fees.

Twenty-four State Analysis of Franchise and Distribution Laws

We conducted an analysis of state and federal franchising and distribution and other laws applicable in 24 states to the franchisor's business relationship and furnished advice to a franchisor in connection with the expansion of its business into those jurisdictions.

Primary Contacts

Karen T. Staib bio photo
Karen T. Staib

Partner

860.251.5612

kstaib@goodwin.com
See All Related Professionals

Keep in Touch

Stay current with our latest insights

Manage Subscriptions
  • Lawyers
  • Capabilities
  • Events
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Pro Bono and Community
  • Blogs and Resource Centers
  • Insights
  • Podcasts
  • Dobbs Decision Resource Center
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility Statement

© Shipman & Goodwin LLP™ 2025. All Rights Reserved