Featured News & Insights

Breaking News: Corporate Transparency Act Becomes a Shadow of its Former Self

→

Appeals Court Stays Injunction on Executive Orders Targeting DEI Programs

→

State of Maryland and Washington Federal Judges Enjoin Two of President Trumps Gender Identity Executive Orders

→

News & Insights

Lawyers

Practices & Industries

Start Date

End Date

Experience

July 17, 2024

Proposed Sale of Rhode Island Healthcare System

→

Obtained a Grant of Summary Judgment for Non-Profit Mental Health Services Provider

→

Obtained a Grant of Summary Judgment in connection with FMLA Interference and Disability Discrimination Claim

→

Obtained Dismissal of All Claims on Behalf of a Municipal Board of Education

→

Obtained Dismissal of Defamation and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims

→

March 19, 2024

Received Favorable Decision in Race and Disability Discrimination Case

→

Successfully Defended Appeal of Denial to Compel Arbitration

→

Represented Connecticut Hospital System in Misdelivered Medication Case

→

Settlements Reached in Crash of B-17 Bomber at Bradley International Airport

→

January 01, 2023

Successful Resolution of Several Lawsuits for Banking Client

→

$1,000,000 Settlement – Cyclist Hit by Truck

→

$500,000 ARBITRATION AWARD—Motor Vehicle Accident –Low Back injury with fusion surgery

→

Defense Verdicts in Product Liability Actions (2018)

→

January 01, 2016

$5.5 Million Judgment for Client Following a Trial Involving Antitrust, Unfair Trade Practices and Breach of Contract Claims

→

January 01, 2016

In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Prods. Liab. Litig. (MDL 2244)

→

July 06, 2015

Ness vs. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al., Baltimore, Maryland (Md. Super. Ct. July 6, 2015)

→

March 27, 2014

Defeated PJR Application in Real Estate Dispute for Bank

→

February 03, 2014

Defense Against Charges of Mail Fraud

→

December 03, 2003

Conviction Overturned

→

Defense of Product Liability Actions in State and Federal Courts (filed 2018)

→

Favorable Settlement of Claims against Information Technology Vendor

→