Skip to Main Content
  • About Us
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • News & Insights
  • Events
  1. Practices
  2. Litigation
  3. Employment Litigation

Employment Litigation

Round table talk image

For decades, we have led our clients through numerous cases of high importance and exposure.  Recently, we helped navigate successful outcomes for our clients involved in wage and hour class actions in the hospitality and service industries, with potential exposure in the millions of dollars. We routinely represent employers, from Fortune 500 to small-to-midsize, in employment discrimination and retaliation claims in federal and state courts nationwide where the potential exposure to the clients is in excess of a million dollars. In some cases, we are able to achieve outright dismissals of the claims through litigation, while in others, the claims have been withdrawn. In still other matters, we have represented clients on appeal; in one matter, our lawyers assisted a client in reversing on appeal a wrongful termination verdict in excess of $10 million.

We are not strangers to handling the particular challenges of high profile cases -- matters that draw the attention of the media and the public. Part of this experience comes from our representation of public agencies and the attendant media interest associated with claims against those agencies, but we have also been involved in matters where employees have raised claims of public concern such as whistleblower and free speech claims. While we are highly capable of handling large complex cases, we bring the same level of attention to detail and professionalism to all of our cases, no matter the size.  Our approach is to foster a partnership with our clients so that we can control both the tangible and intangible costs of litigation.

With the cooperation and assistance of our firm's employee benefits and intellectual property lawyers, we have successfully litigated a variety of ERISA, non-compete and trade secrets cases. For example, we recently achieved a dismissal of a breach of fiduciary duty claim against an employer in federal court at an early stage.

Indeed, our goals in representing clients are two-fold: First, we try to resolve contested cases as early in the process as possible, in order to minimize the costs and risks associated with protracted litigation. Where that is not possible, we bring a deliberate, thoughtful and tenacious approach to representing clients that balances the costs of litigation with the needs of the case. Our approach to employment litigation involves providing our clients with: 

  • Early assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the case 
  • A projected timetable, cost estimate, and exposure to damages 
  • Review of available alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures 
  • A cost benefit analysis of each significant litigation decision
  • The ability, willingness and experience to pursue the case through trial and related appeals    

Related Practices

  • Employment and Labor
  • Litigation

Experience

Higher education

Defended University against Claims of Age Discrimination

Achieved summary judgment in favor of a private Connecticut university on an age discrimination claim challenging the university’s decision to remove a professor from her previously held position as director of an undergraduate program. After the professor filed an appeal, we successfully argued before the Second Circuit resulting in an opinion affirming the district court’s decision in its entirety.

Resolution for College in Groundbreaking Federal Court Case Alleging Implicit Bias 

Successfully represented a private college in a federal court where a professor claimed she was denied tenure and did not receive the training and mentoring provided to other professors due to implicit bias against her. The case was one of the first cases in the country based on a theory of implicit bias. Depositions of experts proposed by plaintiff on this novel theory helped lead to resolution of the case in a favorable manner for the college. 

Successful Representation of College against CHRO Complaints

Represented a college in several CHRO complaints and a federal court lawsuit asserting discrimination and retaliation claims.

Title IX Investigation for Public University  

Conducted Title IX investigation of a high-level administrator at a large public university, which included interview of more than a dozen employees and the completion of a detailed investigatory report.
Load More +

Public and charter schools

Defense of Board of Education against Discrimination and Tort Claims

Represented a board of education against discrimination and tort claims brought by an employee of the company that provided bus services to the board. Obtained summary judgment on the board’s behalf, with the court finding that the board acted within its contractual rights when it asked that the driver be removed from her assigned routes, and that there was no evidentiary basis for the alleged tort claims. The employee appealed to the Appellate Court, where we successfully defended the trial court’s ruling and obtained a full affirmance of the dismissal.

Defense of Board of Education in Termination Hearing

Successfully represented a board of education in termination proceedings under Conn. Gen. Stat. 10-151.  After four days of virtual hearings, the hearing officer found that the Superintendent had proven insubordination and other due and sufficient cause for terminating the teacher, and therefore recommended that the board of education terminate her contract. The case involved a teacher who refused to accept a reassignment, claiming that the new assignment was not consistent with restrictions that her doctor placed on her due to a disability. The hearing officer found that the teacher’s termination did not violate the ADA or the CFEPA, and noted that the school district had engaged in an interactive process with the teacher by offering her accommodations in the new classroom.

Federal Court Lawsuit Claiming Defamation Withdrawn on Behalf of Board of Education

Represented a board of education claim in a tort action brought by a former administrator, who claimed he was defamed by statements made in a newspaper article following his departure. Successfully demonstrated that the alleged statements were all made before the administrator entered into a separation agreement with the board, and therefore the administration had waived all claims. Based on this argument, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the board. The court also entered summary judgment on the board’s counterclaim that the administrator breached the terms of his separation agreement, and thereafter awarded the board the full value of its attorney’s fees in the litigation.

Federal Court Lawsuit Withdrawn without Settlement on Behalf of Board of Education

Represented a board of education in a federal court lawsuit alleging that the school system was deliberately indifferent to sexual harassment and assault of a student. The lawsuit sought relief under Title IX against the board of education and individual employees. The student withdraw the lawsuit without settlement after written discovery and before deposition began.
Load More +

General

Case Dismissal in connection with Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claim by a Former Board of Education Employee

Represented a municipal Board of Education in its defense of claims of disability discrimination and retaliation by an employee in a public hearing before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. The employee claimed that the Board failed to engage in the interactive process when it failed to find a suitable accommodation for the employee, ultimately resulting in the employee’s dismissal. The case was dismissed by the Commission, finding, in part, that the Board had adequately satisfied its obligation to engage in the interactive process.

Received Dismissal of Alleged Discriminatory Hiring Practices Claim

Represented a private-sector client in its defense of claims of retaliation under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46-60(b)(4) and 31-51m. The employee claimed that they were terminated based on their opposition to allegedly discriminatory hiring practices. The case was dismissed in full by the judge, citing insufficient evidence, among other reasons.
 

Received Favorable Decision in Race and Disability Discrimination Case

Represented a municipal Board of Education in its defense of claims of race and disability discrimination and retaliation by a former employee. The employee claimed that they were not promoted based on their race, and that the Board terminated their employment based on a disability. The case was dismissed in full by the judge, citing insufficient evidence, among other reasons, to support both claims.

Wage and Hour Class Action Defense for Major Restaurant

Successfully defended a major restaurant in collective/class action wage and hour regarding tips and overtime. With a defeat of conditional certification, the claims were resolved on an individual basis for a fraction of the overall amount claimed.
Load More +

Insights

Publications

July 22, 2024

Dan Schwartz Discusses Reasonable Accommodations and Hybrid Work Policies in Hartford Business Journal Article

→

July 14, 2023

Connecticut Supreme Court Reaffirms “Transferred Intent” Theory of Discrimination

→
Load More +

News

October 9, 2024

53 Shipman Lawyers Recognized as 2024 Connecticut Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

→

July 22, 2024

Emily McDonough Souza Joins Shipman’s Employment Law Team as Counsel

→
Load More +

Events

October 24, 2023

Putting it in Writing: Legal Ethics for Employment Lawyers

→

October 17, 2023

Emerging Employment Law Challenges: What You Should Know

→
Load More +

Primary Contacts

Jarad M. Lucan bio photos
Jarad M. Lucan

Partner

860.251.5785

jlucan@goodwin.com
See All Related Professionals
  • -

    Visit EmploymentLawLetter.com Blog WIDGET

Keep in Touch

Stay current with our latest insights

Manage Subscriptions
  • Lawyers
  • Capabilities
  • Events
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Pro Bono and Community
  • Blogs and Resource Centers
  • Insights
  • Podcasts
  • Dobbs Decision Resource Center
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility Statement

© Shipman & Goodwin LLP™ 2025. All Rights Reserved